Sunday, January 10, 2016

If Kronke moves Rams to L.A. Raiders and Chargers still have their stadium issues. How does a Rams move to L.A. Help San Diego and Oakland? Rams moving to Los Angeles makes no sense.

Friday, November 27, 2015

Dome Operator says Rams must play in St.Louis, not in London.

Dome operator says Rams must play in St. Louis, not London

The Rams' lease agreement prohibits playing home games in London.
Jeff Curry / USA TODAY Sports
ST. LOUIS -- The NFL announced Wednesday that the Rams will play a home game in London next season and the operator of the Edward Jones Dome in St. Louis responded almost immediately by saying the team's lease agreement prohibits it.

The Rams would play a not-yet-decided NFC East team Oct. 23 at Twickenham Stadium as part of three games in London detailed by the NFL.

In a statement, the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission said it has had no formal discussions with the team about their 2016 plans. The Rams have until Jan. 28 to inform the CVC if they intend to play the 2016 season at the dome, but if they do "the terms of the lease remain in effect and provides that all Rams NFL home games (other than preseason) will be played at the facilities."

A CVC spokesman declined to speculate about what steps the organization might take to keep the team from playing in London. A message seeking comment from the Rams wasn't immediately returned.

There is uncertainty whether the Rams will even belong to St. Louis by then. Owners of the Rams, San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders are all exploring moves to Los Angeles, perhaps as early as next season. Rams owner Stan Kroenke is part of a group planning a new stadium in suburban Los Angeles.

A governor-appointed stadium task force is developing plans for a $1 billion stadium along the Mississippi River as part of the effort to either keep the Rams or lure another team. The task force said in a statement that if the Rams get on board with the project, "we're certain accommodations can be made for the Rams to play one game in London next season."

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Rams set to play a home game in London next season.

Rams set to play a home game in London next season. Week 7 on Sunday, October 23, in the first-ever NFL game at Twickenham Stadium, the St. Louis Rams will host the NFC East team that finishes in the same spot in the standings as the Rams do in the NFC West based on the NFL's scheduling formula.
    If the NFL wants to be in in Los Angeles, why is it playing game in London? Los Angles is and will continue to be a negotion tool for owners to get staduims built in their current cities. I almost feel bad for Los Angeles;because, the NFL continues to tease the city of Los Angeles with an NFL team.

Trace Rams’ Offensive Struggles to Failures in the Draft

Trace Rams’ Offensive Struggles to Failures in the Draft
When the Rams travel to Cincinnati on Sunday, they’ll unpack an offense that ranks 31st in the NFL in total yards per game, 32nd in the league in passing yards per contest, and 31st in points per game.
greg robinson
Rams tackle Greg Robinson, the second overall selection in the 2014 Draft, has been largely ineffective so far for St. Louis.
This level of inefficiency doesn’t happen overnight.
Jeff Fisher and Les Snead deserve credit for restocking a roster that was significantly devoid of talent when they arrived in 2012.
They also deserve blame for how woeful the current product is on offense.
The Rams’ offensive struggles can be traced back to recent drafts. For every Aaron Donald, Michael Brockers and Janoris Jenkins selected on defense, there’s been an Isaiah Pead, Brian Quick and Greg Robinson on offense. This regime has done a great job finding mid and late-round defensive gems like Trumaine Johnson and E.J. Gaines, but there have been misses on Garrett Gilbert, Chris Givens and Barrett Jones to accompany those hits.
Some fans believe teams should hit on all of their draft picks. That’s insane.
Bill Walsh often noted that if a drafted player contributes to the team in a measurable way for at least two years, he should be considered a “good” draft choice.
Not every first-rounder is going to be a Hall of Famer and not every seventh-rounder is going to make the team. All franchises, not just the Rams, have plenty of draft misses.
That said, there’s a clear difference between the current regime’s ability to scout, draft, and develop defenders, and its ability to scout, draft, and develop players on offense.
And therein lies the current problem.
This Rams offense isn’t improving, and despite claims that Fisher’s brand of football is outdated, the bigger problem is talent.
There’s nothing wrong with having a team whose identity is to win games on the strength of its defense and running game. The Seahawks went to back-to-back Super Bowls with that general philosophy and the 2015 Panthers are unbeaten despite the fact that they’re averaging just 40.4 more passing yards per game than the Rams.
Yes, the Seahawks and Panthers have quarterbacks, but don’t stop there. It isn’t just the quarterback position that’s held the Rams back. They haven’t been able to develop a legitimate weapon in the passing game and the offensive line is a mess because of injuries and inexperience.
What’s frustrating is that the Rams clearly have the right approach on defense.
They’ve invested draft picks in the first three rounds on legitimate talent like Donald, Brockers, Jenkins, Johnson, Alec Ogletree, and T.J. McDonald. They also didn’t stop adding quality depth via the trade market (Mark Barron), or free agency (William Hayes and Nick Fairley), just because they were set at a certain position. The Rams knew the importance of having quality depth for when injuries inevitably struck.
But on offense? Snead and Fisher avoided adding a lineman outside of Garrett Reynolds this offseason and instead threw all of their eggs into the 2015 draft basket. They did invest four picks on the offensive line this past April, but what if 2015 turns out to be a down year for offensive linemen? Then the Rams just scarified quality for quantity, and their offensive line is littered with inexperience because of it.
Here’s another reality: The Rams don’t have the personnel to match their current identity on offense.
The plan three years ago was for Sam Bradford to run an offense similar to the system he ran at Oklahoma (i.e. spread the ball out and attack teams with quick, accurate passes that allow receivers to generate yards after contact). But four games into the 2013 season, the Rams scratched that idea, Bradford got hurt, and the rest is history. That’s how you get a Jared Cook and a Tavon Austin (as good as he’s been this season) shoehorned into your current run-first offense.
What’s the solution? The Rams need to take the same relentless approach they’ve used to build a formidable defense and apply it to the other side of the ball. But that’s easier said then done.
Quarterbacks don’t grow on trees, the return on investment in the free agent market is usually poor (as this team knows all too well), and the draft offers just as much risk as hope.
Thankfully, the Rams do have one foundation piece on offense in Todd Gurley. But unless they find a franchise quarterback, a reliable weapon outside of Austin in the passing game, and the young offensive line grows up in a hurry, the frustrations fans currently feel about the offense aren’t going away.

Congratulations to our 2016 Pro Football Hall of Fame Semifinalists!


Tuesday, November 17, 2015

NFL sees record number of long TDs: good offense or terrible defense?

NFL sees record number of long TDs: good offense or terrible defense?.
Jay Busbee at Shutdown Corner

You probably already know this if you've checked your fantasy scores, but the NFL recorded a record number of 75-plus-yard touchdowns on Sunday—six, to be exact. (Hopefully some were for your team and none for your opponent's.) Big plays are dramatic, big plays ignite or deflate the crowd, big plays get the highlight commentators whooping ... but why did we see so many all at once?
The New York Times ran down the list of big plays:

• An 85-yarder by Chicago's Zach Miller against St. Louis;
• An 88-yarder by fellow Bear Jeremy Langford;
• A 78-yarder by Washington's Matt Jones;
• An 80-yarder by Kansas City's Charcandrick West against Denver;
• An 87-yarder by New York's Odell Beckham Jr. against New England; and
• A 76-yarder by the Patriots' Rob Gronkowski against the Giants.

So what can we glean from all this? Is the NFL at last shaking off its no-fun reputation and opening up the game? Are we headed to a spread-offense, send-everybody-deep era of glorious aerial gameplay? Of course not. Most of these plays were the result of defensive miscues and mistakes, bad angles, missed tackles, misread coverages, and much more. Several of the players making big plays were backups at the start of the season, but injuries have, as usual, decimated teams and left them scrambling to patch holes with often-overmatched backups.
  This is a confluence of forces. It's clear that the NFL is in an era of unprecedented offensive bias. Quarterbacks have more room to move, receivers have more latitude in going for the catch, and any time a defender wanders into the same area code, the receiver will make that throw-the-flag gesture. What that's meant is that defenses have to be more conservative, but in surrendering the short-yardage play there's always the possibility of a breakout play.
  The good news? The later we get into the season, the more likely you are to see some of these short-yardage plays go very, very long. The bad news? That increases the odds one will break against you.